M/S Haryana Stone Crusher vs Raj State Pollution Control on 20 July, 2010. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. (1)M/S. RADHEY STONE CRUSHER vs. RAJ. STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD AND ANR. (S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5841 of 2010) (2) M/S. HARYANA STONE CRUSHER vs. …
The Supreme Court temporarily put the Texas law on hold in May 2022. Conservative Justice A. Alito Jr., joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch, said he had not made up his ...
Court Crusher is a sinstone golem located in the Ember Court.. Abilities Dread Chaos — Expels sinful energy at multiple locations, which explode, inflicting Shadow damage. Lesser amounts of energy move away from the impact points, inflicting Shadow damage to any enemies within them. Sinstone Smash — Emerge from the ground, damaging and …
Palampur, May 23. Residents of Bathan panchayat in Thural tehsil today welcomed the decision of the Himachal Pradesh High Court to treat as Public Interest Litigation (PIL) their letter written to ...
Terming the Standing Order issued by J&K Govt in 2021 for regulation of the stone crushing units in the UT as a valid piece of legislation, the Jammu and Kashmir …
Uttarakhand High Court State Of Uttarakhand And Others. ... vs Badesha Stone Crusher on 16 July, 2019 Author: Alok Kumar Verma Bench: Ramesh Ranganathan, Alok Kumar Verma IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL SPECIAL APPEAL NO. 156 of 2019 State of Uttarakhand and others. .....
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND Writ Petition No. 2413 of 2012(M/S) Kumaun Stone Crusher Association and others Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others.Respondents With Writ Petition No. 2494 of 2012 (M/S) M/s Uttaranchal Associates Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others.Respondents …
The petitioner has also sought a direction to respondent to 3 to allow him to operate his stone crusher in view of S.O. 60 dated 23rd of February, 2021, whereby the Jammu and Kashmir Stone Crushers/Hot and Wet Mixing Plants Regulation Rules, 2021, have been promulgated. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset would submit that ...
The grievance of the petitioners is that the State Government of Uttarakhand cannot force the petitioners to obtain transit pass and to pay transit fee in terms of Rules …
2. The petitioner before this Court has filed the present petition i.e., W.P.5091/2021 being aggrieved by the order dated 31.7.2021 passed by the Deputy Commissioner cum Chairman, District Regulation of Stone Crusher and Licencing Authority, withdrawing Form-C licence issued to the petitioner in respect of the land in question. 3.
Following shall be the Roster for the High Court of Chhattisgarh with effect from 10.07.2024 till further orders. PDF; Order No. 632/Confdl./2024 Bilaspur, dated 06 th July 2024. PDF; Order No. 630/Confdl./2024 Bilaspur, dated 05 th July 2024. PDF; Order No. 626/Confdl./2024 Bilaspur, dated 04 th July 2024. PDF
respondent to 3 to allow the petitioner to operate. the stone crusher in view of S.O. 60 dated 23 rd of. February 2021 called as "The Jammu and Kashmir. Stone Crushers/Hot and Wet Mixing Plants Regulation. Rules 2021 and also in view of court direction passed in. WP (C) 457 of 2021.".
Get free access to the complete judgment in Ashok Stone Crusher,... v. State Of Uttarakhand... on CaseMine. ... Uttarakhand High Court Mar 16, 2010; Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI ... Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the Judgment passed on 26-06-2007 by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition …
Contact Registrar General High Court of Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur, India - 482001 0761-2620380, 2622674, 2626734 IVRS Number - 0761-2637400 email - mphc[at]nic[dot]in
The Bombay High Court will pronounce on December 1, 2023 its judgement on a clutch of petitions challenging the Rule 3(i)(II)(C) of the IT Amendment Rules, 2023 enabling a government established ...
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Chief Justice's Court Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11671 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Hind Stone Crusher Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shamshuddin Khan (S U Khan) Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sandeep Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,Chief Justice Hon'ble …
stone crusher units by using the raw material obtained from legitimate source(s) and that they will not extract or procure such raw material from river Tawi and …
I have perused the order dated 26-6-2007 passed by the Division Bench of this Court and I find that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition stands resolved by the order dated 26-6-2007 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 993 of 2004(M/B) M/s Gupta Builders v. State of Uttaranchal This Court in paragraph 22 has observed as …
M/S Lakhwinder Sigh Stone Crushers vs . Uoi & Ors. on 7 November, 2023. Learn how it works! Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get …
A resident of Maswasi, Maqsood, had also filed a petition before the Allahabad High Court against one of the stone crusher units. The HC ordered the district authorities to cancelled the licence ...
Full Court Reference in the First Court Hall on 27-6-2024 at 3:45 pm to condole the demise of Honourable Sri Justice Devinder Gupta, former C.J., erstwhile High Court of AP and former Judge, HP and Delhi High Courts - J.Spl. (Admn.)-dt. 26-6-2024. e-mail received from the Registrar (Administration), National Judicial Academy, Bhopal ...
A.JAYAKANTHAN v. J.R.S.CRUSHER. This appeal has been filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, challenging the order dated 12.04.2021 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in M.P. No.20 of 2020 under Section 13 (3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act dismissing the application filed by the Appellant requesting the …
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that these. petitions are fully covered by a judgment of this Court dated 19.04.2021. passed in WP (C) No.308/2021 titled M/s Trikuta Stone Crusher v. Union. Territory of J&K and others and clubbed matters and, therefore, can be.
The High Court upheld the validity of the Third Amendment but invalidated the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. The orders passed by the High Court are stayed to the extent of the invalidated amendments. Rule 5 seeks to impose transit fee on forest produce, with the definition of "forest produce" as per Section 2(4) of the Forest Act, 1927. Issues: 1.
Smart Summary (Beta) Facts: The petitioners, who are proprietorship firms owning a stone crusher each, failed to discharge their full liabilities as per the notice …
The petitioner told the Himachal high court that one Shri Ramesh Kumar had applied for a no objection certificate from the gram panchayat, for setting up a stone crusher and the panchayat had ...
Union of India 1992 SCC 256 as also notification dated 18.12.1992 issued by the Government of Haryana came to the conclusion that installing of stone crusher was actionable nuisance and was otherwise in violation of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as the judgment passed by this Court and accordingly restrained the …
Dehradun: The Uttarakhand high court on Wednesday directed the state government to respond within four weeks to a petition that complained about the increase in stone crushers being operated in ...
All the writ petitioners supported the judgment of Uttarakhand High Court dated 01.07.2004 in M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher wherein, the High Court has held that no levy of Transit …
The Calcutta High Court is the oldest High Court in India. It was established on 1st July, 1862 under the High Court's Act, 1861. It has jurisdiction over the state of West Bengal and the Union Territory of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The High Court building was designed by Mr. Walter Granville, Government Architect, on the model of …